we treat notations of closed set, closure of set and limit point. These lead naturally to consideration of a certain axiom for topological spaces called the Hausdorff axiom.
A subset of a topological space is said to be closed if the set X−A is open.
ex1) the subset of R is closed because its complement
R−[a,b]=(+∞,a) ∪ (b,∞)is open. similarly [a,+∞) is closed, because ints complement (−∞,a) is open. these facts justify our use of terms closed interval and closed ray. the subset of R is neither open nor closed.
ex2) In the plane , the set
is closed, because its complement is the union of the two sets
each of which is a product of open sets of and is open in .
ex3) In the finite complement topology on a set , the closed sets consist of itself and all finite subsets of .
ex4) In the discrete topology on the set , every set is open; it follows that every set is closed as well.
ex5) consider the following subset of the real line
in the subspace topology. In this space, the set is open. similarly is open as a subset of ; it's even open in . since and are complements in of each other, we conclude that both are closed as subset of .
Theorem 17.1 Let be a topological spaces. then the following conditions hold
proof.
and are closed because they are the complements of the open sets and , respectively.
Given a collection of closed sets , Applying DeMorgan's law
since the sets X−A_α are open by definition, the right side represents an arbitrary union of open sets, and is open. therefore is closed.
similiarly if is closed for i=1, ⋯,n, consider the equation
The set on the right side is a finite intersection of open sets and is open. hence is closed.
If is a subspace of , we say that a set is closed in if is a subset of and is closed in the subspace topology of .
Theorem 17.2 Let be a subspace of . then a set is closed in if and only if it equals the intersection of a closed set of with .
proof. Assume that , where is closed in (see Fig 17.1) then X−C is open in , so that is open in , by definition of the subspace topology, but . hence is open in . so that is closed in . conversely, assume that is closed in (Fig 17.2) then Y−A is open in Y, so by definition it equals the intersection of an open set U of X with Y. the set X−U is closed in X, and
so that equals the intersection of a closed set of with , as desired.
Theorem 17.3 Let be a subspace of . If is closed in and is closed in , then A is closed in .
proof. since is closed in , by thm 17.2, , where is closed in . so that A is closed in . because is closed in , by closed condition 2.
Given a subset of a topological space , the interior of is defined as the unions of all open set contained in . and the closure of is defined as the intersections of all closed set containing . The interior of is denoted by and the closure of is denoted by by . obvisously is an open set and is a closed set; furthermore,
if is open, ; while is closed, .
Theorem 17.4 Let be a subspace of ; Let be a subset of ; Let denoted by a closure of in . then a closure of in equals .
proof. Let denoted by a closure of in . the set is closed in . so is closed in by Thm 17.2.
since contains , and since by definition, equals the intersections of all closed set containing , we must have .
on the other hand, we know that is closed in . hence by thm 17.2, for some set is closed in . then is a closed set of containing ; because is the intersections of all such closed sets we conclude then .
The definition of the closure doesn't give us a convenient way for finding the closures of a specific set.
First let us introduce some convenient terminology. we shall say that a set intersects a set in the intersection is not empty.
Theorem 17.5 Let be a subset of the topoloical space .
(a) then if and only if every open set containing intersects .
(b) supposing the topology of is given by a basis, then if and only if every basis element containing intersects .
proof.consider the statement in (a), It's a statement form . Let us transform each implication to its contrapositive, thereby obtaining the logically equivalent statement written out, it's following.
there exists an open set containing that doesn't intersect .
In this form, our theorem is easy to prove.
If is not in , the set is an open set containg that doesn't intersect .
conversely, if there exists an open set containing which doesn't intersect , then is a closed set containing . by definition of the closure , the set must contain ; therefore cannot be in .
Statement (b) follows readily, If every open set containing intersects , so does every basis element containing , because is open. conversely if every basis element containing intersects , so does every open set containing because contains a basis element that contains .
we shorten the statement " is an open set containing " to the phrase
" is a neighborhood of "
using this terminology, one can write the first half of the preceding theorem as follows.
If is a subset of topological space , then if and only iff every neighborhood of intersects .
Example Let be the real line . If for every neighborhood of 0 intersects , while every point outside has a neighborhood disjoint from . similar arguments apply to the following subset of :
If , then . If then . If is the set of ational numbers then , . if is the set of positive reals, then the closure of is .
Example Consider the subspace of the real line . the set is a subset of ; its closure in is the set and its closure in is the set .
If is a subset of the topological space and if is a point of , we say that is a limit point of if every neighborhood of intersects in some point other than itself. say differently,
is a limit point of if it belongs to the closure of .
Example Consider the real line in , If , then the point 0 is a limit point of and so is the point In fact every point of the interval is a limit point of .
If , then 0 is the only limit point of . if then the limit point of are the points of the interval . a limit point of is every point of . a limit point of is no point of . a limit point of is a point of .
Theorem 17.6 Let be a subset of the topological space ; Let be the set of all limit points of then .
proof. If is in , every neighborhood of intersects . therefore, by thm 17.5 belongs to hence , since by definition , .
To demonstrate the reverse inclusion, we let be a point of and show that . if happens to lie in , it is trivial that ; suppose that does not lie in . since , we know that every neighborhood of intersects ; because , the set must intersect in a point from different from ; then is a limit point , , so that .
Corollary 17.7 A subset of a topological space is closed if and only if it contains all its limit points.
proof. the set is closed if and only if and the latter holds if and only if .
Definition A topological space is called Hausdorff space if for each pair , of distinct points of , there exists neighborhood and of , , respectively, that are disjoint.
Theorem 17.8 Every finite point set in Hausdorff space is closed.
proof. It suffices to show that every one-point is closed. if of is different from , then and has disjoint neighborhood and , respectively. since does not intersect , the point cannot belong to the closure of . as a result, the closure of the is itself, so that it is closed.
The condition that finite point sets be closed is in fact weaker than Hausdorff condition. for example,the real line in the finite complement topology is not a Hausdorff space, but it is a space in which finite sets are closed.
the condition that finite sets be closed has been given a name of tis own: its called axiom.
Theorem 17.9 Let be a space satisfying the axiom; Let be a subset of . then the point is a limit point of . if and only if every neighborhood of contains infinitely many points of .
proof. If every neighborhood of intersects in infinitely many points, it intersects in some points other than itself so that is a limit point of .
conversely, suppose that is a limit point of , and suppose some neighborhood of x intersects in only finitely many points, then also intersects in finitely points; let be the points of . the set is open, since the finite point set is closed.
is a neighborhood of that intersects . thist contradicts assumption that is a limit point of .
Theorem 17.10 If is a hausdorff space, then a sequence of points of converges to at most one point of .
proof. Suppose that is a sequence of points that converges to . if , let and be disjoint neighborhood of and , respectively. since contains for all but finitley many values of n, the set cannot. therefore, cannot converge to .
Definition If the sequence of points of the Hausdorff space converges to the point of , we often write , and we say that is the limit of the sequence .
Theorem 17.11 (1)Every simply ordered set is a Hausdorff space in the order topology. (2)the product of two Hausdorff space is a Hausdorff space. (3)A subspace of a Hausdorff space is a Hausdorff space.
proof. (1) If , is points of the ordered space . is elements of the ordered topology, that are disjoint.
(2) Let and be a Hausdorff spaces. there exists and that contains and , respectively. which are disjoint the the topology of . similiary there exists and in the space . , belong to and , respectively. and are disjoint.
(3) let be a subset of the Hausdorff space . there exists and , which are open and disjoint, that contains and , respectively. is different than . and contains and . then and is open in the subspace topology of , that are disjoint.