Bertrand's postulate
There is always a prime number at least with n<p<2n.
Proof
we use a contradiction:an integer n≥2 such that there is no prime p with n<p<2n.
Define R(p,n) to be (2nn)'s exponent of a prime factor.
(2nn)=1<p<2n∏pR(p,n)
(2nn)=(n!)2(2n)! when 32n<p<n, there is a two numbers p, 2p in (2n)!. there is a two numbers in the nominator, too. therefore, (2nn) don't have a factor of p. By a contradiction, all prime factor of (2nn) is greater than 32n.
(2nn)=p<32n∏p
also, p>√2n has one exponent of a factor in (2nn).
(2nn)<1<p≤√2n∏pR(p,n)√2n<p≤32n∏p- (1)
The exponent of p in n! is
j=1∑∞⌊pjn⌋
[Legendre's formula](file://./legendre_formula.html) so,
R(p,n)=j=1∑∞⌊pj2n⌋−2j=1∑∞⌊pjn⌋=j=1∑∞(⌊pj2n⌋−2⌊pjn⌋)
if pjn has a first number of decimal representation is greater than 5, the last summation is zero. otherwise, it is one. but all terms with j>logp2n is zero. therefor,
R(p,n)≤logp2n
1<p≤√2n∏pR(p,n)√2n<p≤32n∏p<(2n)√2n1<p≤32n∏p- (2)
(Lemma) For all real numbers x≥3, ∏1<p≤np<22n−3
Proof
∏1<p≤np∏1<p≤2n−1p≤(2n−1n)=21((2nn)−(2nn−1))<21(1+1)2n<22n−2
therefore, ∏1<p≤2n−1p<22n−2∏1<p≤np
using mathmatical induction, assume that ∏1<p≤mp<22n−3
- odd case
- If n=3, ∏1<p≤np=6<25
- If n=2m−1, ∏1<p≤2m−1p<22m−2∏1<p≤mp<22m−222m−3=24m−5=22(2m−1)−3
- even case
- If n = 4, ∏1<p≤np=6<26
- If n=2m, ∏1<p≤2mp<22m−1∏1<p≤mp<22m−122m−2=24m−3=22(2m)−3
QED
apply above lemma,
(2n)√2n1<p≤32n∏p<(2n)√2n234n−3<(2n)√2n234n
therefore,
(2nn)<(2n)√2n234n
and (2nn) is less than
4n=(1+1)2n=k=0∑2n(2nk)=2+k=1∑2n−1(2nk)≤2n(2nn)
2n22n≤(2nn)
so,
2n22n≤(2nn)<(2n)√2n234n
22n≤(2n)√2n+1234n
take log2 yield to
2n≤(√2n+1)log2(2n)+34n
32n≤(√2n+1)log2(2n)
we obtain n≤467 but when n≤467, the prime numbers 3, 5, 7, 13, 23, 43, 83, 163, 317, 631 is chosen, such that n<p<2n. it is contradiction.